How to write a peer review evaluation
Negative peer review example
Any other points Confidential comments for the editors Some journals have a space for reviewers to enter confidential comments about the manuscript. Editors are not out to police every paper, but when plagiarism is discovered during peer review it can be properly addressed ahead of publication. Then, generously, suggest other texts and fields they might bring into conversation with their project. Whether they are fraternal is unknown fraternal twins being the complement of identical twins — that is the question the parents are asking. Where information is clear, you should check that: The results seem plausible, in case there is an error in data gathering The trends you can see support the paper's discussion and conclusions There are sufficient data. Ask yourself key questions, including: Does it have a relevant title and valuable research question? If the conclusions are not evidence-based, it's appropriate to ask for them to be re-written. And it does update the prior. Professional[ edit ] Professional peer review focuses on the performance of professionals, with a view to improving quality, upholding standards, or providing certification. I advise the authors work with a writing coach or copyeditor to improve the flow and readability of the text. It is probably easiest to show the lack of influence of the prior using MCMC sampling.
Be professional and respectful. Time to Submit the Review! Tell the journal so that they know what to expect. However, one possible way to analyse this example using frequentist methods would be to assess the likelihood of obtaining the data for each of the two hypothesis the twins are identical or fraternal.
Any serious issues should be raised directly and immediately with the journal as well. This lack of understanding has manifested, in part, because peer reviews are a largely occluded or closed genre of writing not public in nature Swales Summary Give positive feedback first.
So in the spirit of fairness, write comments to editors as though authors might read them too. Peer review can be, consequently, a difficult genre of writing to produce, particularly for early career researchers who have little experience with this kinds of writing.
based on 23 review